Tiger's ball vs the benchmark. The Tour B XS is the spin specialist Tiger Woods helped build, with some of the highest wedge-spin numbers in the entire testing field; the Pro V1 is the complete, neutral reference every ball is measured against. One wins four of seven categories — the other wins the one short-game players care about most.
Quick verdict
The Pro V1 is the pick for most golfers— it takes the higher 9.4 consensus to the XS's 9.1 by winning four of seven categories: driver distance, feel, flight, and durability. It's the complete, neutral, do-everything ball — the most-played ball in golf, MyGolfSpy's calibration standard, and the option that asks no compromise and fits the widest range of players.
The Tour B XS is the greenside-spin specialist— its REACTIV iQ ‘smart cover’ wins the short-game category outright (9.4 vs 9.2) with some of the highest wedge-spin numbers in the testing field, wrapped in one of the softest tour compressions in the game (~85). The pick if greenside bite is your No. 1 criterion — and if you swing the driver fast enough (105+ mph) to activate a core Bridgestone deliberately built for speed.
Bridgestone
3-piece, REACTIV iQ ‘smart cover’ urethane, ~85 compression — one of the softest tour balls in golf and its greenside-spin standout. Tiger Woods helped build it; the 2026 VeloSurge core adds speed and a wind-beating flight.
Titleist
3-piece, soft cast urethane cover, reformulated high-gradient core. The neutral, mid-spin, do-everything benchmark — the most-played ball in golf and MyGolfSpy's calibration standard.
Prices checked at Amazon & major golf retailers — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Disclosure.
Tour B XS wins 2 of 7 · Pro V1 wins 4 of 7 · 1 tied
Tour B XS
Pro V1
A spin-first ball that concedes a little raw speed — Golf Monthly noted slightly slower ball speeds than some competitors and a touch less mid-iron carry (a 7-iron at 173 vs 175 yards). The 2026 VeloSurge core narrows the gap, though: Golf Monthly measured the XS matching Pro V1 carry off the tee (299 vs 298 yards) despite the slower ball speed.
A neutral, mid-spin ball rather than a bomber — it settled for a bronze off the tee in Today’s Golfer’s 62-ball robot test — but the 2025 high-gradient core added roughly 3–4 yards of carry and about 300 rpm less driver spin over the 2023 ball. The faster, more proven distance profile of the two.
Tour B XS
Pro V1
The REACTIV iQ cover’s steep ‘spin slope’ — low-spin off the tee, high-spin into the greens — pays off with the scoring clubs: Golf Monthly found the descent angle and spin into the greens made it ‘superb for holding firm targets.’
The reformulated high-gradient core trims long-game spin while adding the scoring spin that matters — testers measured more iron and wedge spin than the 2023 ball. A dead heat at 9.3: two elite approach-spin profiles arrived at from opposite directions.
Tour B XS
Pro V1
The headline category and the reason this ball exists. The REACTIV iQ urethane grabs the grooves on touch shots: MyGolfSpy’s 2025 robot test flagged it as one of the highest in its 35-yard wedge test, Today’s Golfer measured roughly 6,000 rpm of short-game spin (among the highest it recorded), and National Club Golfer logged wedge numbers north of 8,000 rpm.
Strong, repeatable bite — past 5,700 rpm on a 40-yard pitch — but not the spin king. Its own reviewers concede the point: LaunchPoint Golf lists the Tour B XS among the balls that out-spin it around the greens, alongside the TP5 and Chrome Tour X.
Tour B XS
Pro V1
By the numbers the softer ball — at roughly 85 compression it’s one of the softest ‘tour’ balls in the game. National Club Golfer put it bluntly: ‘this ball is soft, there is no doubt about that’ — soft but communicative off the wedge and putter, not mushy.
Firmer on the gauge (~92.5 measured) yet the stronger feel consensus — reviewers rate it among the best-feeling balls in golf, with a pure roll on the greens, and Today’s Golfer’s tester couldn’t recall a better-feeling ball in years. Softness is the XS’s edge; the quality of the feedback is the Pro V1’s.
Tour B XS
Pro V1
A mid-to-high, high-spin window — higher-launching and notably spinnier than the firmer Tour B X. The 2026 VeloSurge core is a real step forward in the breeze — one tester said the new XS ‘just doesn’t care that the wind exists’ — but it remains the higher-flying flight of the two.
The penetrating, neutral mid flight the category is measured against — low long-game spin, a flatter window that bores through wind, and a silver medal for launch-angle consistency in Today’s Golfer’s 62-ball robot test.
Tour B XS
Pro V1
The most-cited weakness. The soft, grippy urethane picks up wear: Today’s Golfer’s tester reported a ball that scuffed after only a couple of holes and deteriorated enough to be retired early in the round — the price of a cover this soft.
The cast urethane elastomer cover is durable and scuff-resistant — typical Titleist tour-ball longevity over a full round, and a clear practical edge over the XS if you hate swapping balls mid-round.
Tour B XS
Pro V1
Both sit at the same $54.99 a dozen, so this is a nominal one-tenth edge — helped at the margin by periodic buy-more retail promotions and cheap prior-generation Tour B closeouts. Neither has the value cushion of a Kirkland or Maxfli Tour.
At $54.99 a dozen it’s among the most expensive balls on the market, just as value urethane — the Kirkland Signature at roughly $17.50, the Maxfli Tour at $39.99 or less — has closed much of the gap for golfers who don’t need every increment of consistency.
Buy the Tour B XS if you...
Buy the Pro V1 if you...
This is Tiger's ball against the benchmark. The Tour B XS has arguably the most famous development story in golf-ball history — Tiger Woods worked directly with Bridgestone on it and won the 2018 Tour Championship and the 2019 Masters with it — while the Pro V1 is the most-played ball on every major professional tour and the reference point MyGolfSpy uses to calibrate its entire test database. Both are 3-piece, $54.99 cast-urethane tour balls. The consensus splits them by three tenths, 9.4 to 9.1, and the scorecard tells the story: the Pro V1 wins four of seven categories, the XS wins greenside spin outright and takes a nominal edge on value, and approach spin is a dead heat. Generalist against specialist.
The XS's case is the short game — and it isn't a subtle one. Its REACTIV iQ ‘smart cover’ is designed to firm up against a driver strike to protect ball speed, then stay soft and grippy on low-energy touch shots, and the measured results are some of the highest wedge-spin numbers in the entire testing field: roughly 6,000 rpm of short-game spin at Today's Golfer (among the highest it recorded), north of 8,000 rpm on wedges at National Club Golfer, and a flag from MyGolfSpy's 2025 robot test as one of the highest in its 35-yard wedge test. Even the Pro V1's own reviewers concede the point — LaunchPoint Golf names the Tour B XS among the balls that out-spin it. Add one of the softest tour compressions in the game (~85) and a 2026 VeloSurge core that matched Pro V1 carry in Golf Monthly's testing (299 vs 298 yards) while dramatically steadying the flight in wind, and the specialist's brief looks stronger than it has in years.
The Pro V1 still wins on balance because it concedes almost nothing anywhere. It out-scores the XS on driver distance, feel, flight, and durability; its consistency dossier — a 93.0 Ball Lab Quality Score, a perfect 100% Good Ball Rate, a compression delta among the tightest of more than 100 balls tested — is documentation the XS simply doesn't have (its most detailed lab teardown is on an earlier generation); and its cast urethane cover survives a full round where the XS's can scuff after a couple of holes. There's a fit question too: Bridgestone builds the XS for driver swings above about 105 mph and steers slower players to the Tour B RX and RXS, while the Pro V1 fits nearly everyone. So the honest read is this: the Pro V1 is the better ball for most golfers; the Tour B XS is the better ball for the specific golfer it was built for — fast swing, feel-first, scoring inside 120 yards — who'll happily trade a sliver of driver carry and cover life for the best greenside bite in the matchup.
“The amount of spin on the short game is incredible — this is a true combination of high spin and solid distance, a tour-level ball, no question.”
National Club Golfer·Equipment reviewer, on the Tour B XSFavors Tour B XS
“I don’t know whether I’ve played with a better-feeling golf ball over the past couple of years.”
Today’s Golfer·James Hogg, on the Pro V1Favors Pro V1
“It’s a great ball, but it isn’t the greenside-spin leader — the TP5, Tour B XS, and Chrome Tour X produce higher wedge spin.”
LaunchPoint Golf·Equipment reviewer, on the Pro V1Favors Tour B XS
“It earned a perfect Good Ball Rate — every ball passed with zero defects — and a compression delta among the best in our database. This is as consistent as golf balls get.”
MyGolfSpy Ball Lab·On the Pro V1Favors Pro V1
Tour B XS — our take
The specialist, and an excellent one. It wins the category it was built for — greenside spin, 9.4 to 9.2, on some of the highest wedge numbers in the field — nominally edges the value column, and ties on approach spin, all wrapped in one of the softest tour compressions in the game and genuine major pedigree. The honest 9.1 reflects the trade: a touch less driver speed, a cover that scuffs, a narrower 105+ mph fit, and a thinner public consistency dossier than the benchmark's.
✦ Best for: fast-swinging, feel-first players whose scoring lives inside 120 yards
Pro V1 — our take
The clear overall winner at 9.4 — it takes four of seven categories (driver distance, feel, flight, and durability) and concedes only the greenside-spin crown. The most-played, most-documented, most complete ball in golf: class-leading consistency, a penetrating flight that bores through wind, and a cover that lasts a full round. Unless short-game bite is your single non-negotiable, this is the default.
✦ Best for: most golfers — the complete, no-weakness benchmark
For most golfers, no — the Pro V1 takes the higher consensus (9.4 vs 9.1 across 31 combined sources) by winning four of seven categories: driver distance, feel, flight, and durability. It's the complete, neutral benchmark — the most-played ball in golf and MyGolfSpy's calibration standard. The Tour B XS is the specialist: it wins greenside spin outright (9.4 vs 9.2) with some of the highest wedge-spin numbers in the testing field, and it's the better pick for fast-swinging players who prioritize short-game bite above all.
The Tour B XS — it's the one category it wins outright (9.4 vs 9.2). Its REACTIV iQ urethane cover produced roughly 6,000 rpm of short-game spin in Today's Golfer's testing (among the highest it recorded), wedge numbers north of 8,000 rpm at National Club Golfer, and a flag from MyGolfSpy's 2025 robot test as one of the highest in its 35-yard wedge test. The Pro V1 is strong — past 5,700 rpm on a 40-yard pitch — but its own reviewers concede it isn't the greenside-spin leader, and LaunchPoint Golf names the Tour B XS among the balls that out-spin it.
The Tour B XS. Tiger Woods worked directly with Bridgestone on it and won the 2018 Tour Championship and the 2019 Masters with it, though in 2024 he moved to the firmer Tour B X for a touch more distance — so the XS carries his design DNA rather than being his current gamer. It matters as evidence: reviewers treat that development story and Bridgestone's heavy player-testing program as proof the ball performs under pressure. The Pro V1 counters with the broadest validation in golf — the most-played ball on every major tour and the ball MyGolfSpy uses to calibrate its entire test database.
The Pro V1. Bridgestone builds the Tour B XS specifically for driver swing speeds above about 105 mph — slower swingers won't fully compress it and will leave performance on the table, which is why Bridgestone's own fitting steers moderate speeds to the lower-compression Tour B RX and RXS instead. The Pro V1 fits a far wider range: even players under 90 mph keep its feel, consistency, and greenside control, though the 2025 ball measures a touch firmer than its predecessor, so the softest-feel seekers should fit by feel and flight.